2024 Volume 33 Issue 11
Article Contents

Lei Peng(彭磊), Zhen Sun(孙震), Ji-Zhong Sun(孙继忠), Rajesh Maingi, Fang Gao(高放), Xavier Bonnin, Hua-Yi Chang(常华溢), Wei-Kang Wang(汪炜康), and Jin-Yuan Liu(刘金远). 2024: Comparative study of boron and neon injections on divertor heat fluxes using SOLPS-ITER simulations, Chinese Physics B, 33(11): 115201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ad711e
Citation: Lei Peng(彭磊), Zhen Sun(孙震), Ji-Zhong Sun(孙继忠), Rajesh Maingi, Fang Gao(高放), Xavier Bonnin, Hua-Yi Chang(常华溢), Wei-Kang Wang(汪炜康), and Jin-Yuan Liu(刘金远). 2024: Comparative study of boron and neon injections on divertor heat fluxes using SOLPS-ITER simulations, Chinese Physics B, 33(11): 115201. doi: 10.1088/1674-1056/ad711e

Comparative study of boron and neon injections on divertor heat fluxes using SOLPS-ITER simulations

  • Received Date: 29/06/2024
    Accepted Date: 13/08/2024
  • Fund Project:

    Project supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2019YFE03030004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12275040), and the Users with Excellence Program of Hefei Science Center CAS (Grant No. 2020HSC-UE010). This research is also sponsored in part by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DEAC02-09CH11466.

  • PACS: 52.25.Vy; 52.55.Fa; 52.55.Rk; 52.65.-y

  • Based on the EAST equilibrium, the effects of boron (B) and neon (Ne) injected at different locations on the target heat load, and the distributions of B and Ne particles were investigated by transport code SOLPS-ITER. It was found that the B injection was more sensitive to the injection location for heat flux control than impurity Ne. The high electron and ion densities near the inner target in the discharge with impurity B injected from over $X$-point ($R_{1}$) led to plasma detachment only at the inner target, and the localized B ions in the cases with injection from outer target location ($R_{2}$) and upstream location ($R_{3}$) led to far-SOL detachment at the outer target, but not at the inner target. In contrast, for Ne, the spatial distributions of Ne ions and electrons were found to be similar in all the cases at the three injection locations, and the detached plasma was achieved at the inner target and the electron temperature was reduced at the outer target. For locations $R_{2}$ and $R_{3}$, impurity B showed a more pronounced effect on the heat flux at the far-SOL of the outer target. Further analysis indicated that Ne atoms came mainly from the recycling sources, whereas B atoms came mainly from injection, and that their distinct atomic distributions resulted from the difference in the ionization threshold and ionization mean free path. In addition, the radiation proportion of B in the divertor region was larger than that of Ne when the total radiation power was similar, which suggests that B has less influence on the core region.
  • 加载中
  • Xiao W W, Diamond P H, Zou X L, et al. 2012 Nuclear Fusion 52 114027

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Lunsford R, Hu J S, Sun Z, et al. 2018 Nuclear Fusion 58 126021

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Lang P T, Maingi R, Mansfield D K, et al. 2017 Nuclear Fusion 57 016030

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Reimold F, Wischmeier M, Bernert M, et al. 2015 Nuclear Fusion 55 033004

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Kallenbach A, Dux R, Fuchs J C, et al. 2010 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 52 055002

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Nakano T 2015 Journal of Nuclear Materials 463 555

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Bernert M, Wischmeier M, Huber A, et al. 2017 Nuclear Materials and Energy 12 111

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Pitts R A, Bonnin X, Escourbiac F, et al. 2019 Nuclear Materials and Energy 20 100696

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Li L, Zhang D H, Meng X C, et al. 2021 Nuclear Materials and Energy 28 101049

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Li K, Lin X, Yang Z, et al. 2023 Nuclear Fusion 63 026025

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Lunsford R, Rohde V, Bortolon A, et al. 2019 Nuclear Fusion 59 126034

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Kawate T, Ashikawa N, Goto M, et al. 2022 Nuclear Fusion 62 126052

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Gilson E P, Lee H H, Bortolon A, et al. 2021 Nuclear Materials and Energy 28 101043

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Bodner G, Gallo A, Diallo A, et al. 2022 Nuclear Fusion 62 086020

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Effenberg F, Bortolon A, Casali L, et al. 2022 Nuclear Fusion 62 106015

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Sun Z, Diallo A, Maingi R, et al. 2021 Nuclear Fusion 61 014002

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Maingi R, Hu J S, Sun Z, et al. 2020 Journal of Fusion Energy 39 429

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Stangeby P C 2000 The Plasma Boundary of Magnetic Fusion Devices (Boca Raton)

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Schneider R, Bonnin X, Borrass K, et al. 2006 Contributions to Plasma Physics 46 3

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Chankin A V, Coster D P, Dux R, et al. 2006 Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 48 839

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Bonnin X, Dekeyser W, Pitts R, et al. 2016 Plasma and Fusion Research 11 1403102

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Xu W, Hu J S, Sun Z, et al. 2021 Physica Scripta 96 124034

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Wang R, Yang Z, Li K, et al. 2022 Physics of Plasmas 29 112502

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Sun Z, Maingi R, Hu J S, et al. 2019 Nuclear Materials and Energy 19 124

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Jia G, Wang H, Xu G, et al. 2022 Nuclear Fusion 62 056005

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Ma X, Wang H Q, Guo H Y, et al. 2021 Nuclear Fusion 61 054002

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Xu J C, Wang L, Wang H Q, et al. 2021 Nuclear Fusion 61 096004

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Paradela Pérez I, Groth M, Wischmeier M, et al. 2019 Nuclear Materials and Energy 19 531

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Park J S, Bonnin X, Pitts R, et al. 2024 Nuclear Fusion 64 036002

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Tokar M Z 2008 Fusion Science and Technology 53 243

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    OPEN-ADAS, https://open.adas.ac.uk/

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Xu G S, Yuan Q P, Li K D, et al. 2020 Nuclear Fusion 60 086001

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Groth M, Andrew P, Fundamenski W, et al. 2002 Nuclear Fusion 42 591

    Google Scholar Pub Med

    Chrobak C P, Stangeby P C, Hollmann E, et al. 2018 Nuclear Fusion 58 106019

    Google Scholar Pub Med

  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Article Metrics

Article views(139) PDF downloads(0) Cited by(0)

Access History

Comparative study of boron and neon injections on divertor heat fluxes using SOLPS-ITER simulations

Fund Project: 

Abstract: Based on the EAST equilibrium, the effects of boron (B) and neon (Ne) injected at different locations on the target heat load, and the distributions of B and Ne particles were investigated by transport code SOLPS-ITER. It was found that the B injection was more sensitive to the injection location for heat flux control than impurity Ne. The high electron and ion densities near the inner target in the discharge with impurity B injected from over $X$-point ($R_{1}$) led to plasma detachment only at the inner target, and the localized B ions in the cases with injection from outer target location ($R_{2}$) and upstream location ($R_{3}$) led to far-SOL detachment at the outer target, but not at the inner target. In contrast, for Ne, the spatial distributions of Ne ions and electrons were found to be similar in all the cases at the three injection locations, and the detached plasma was achieved at the inner target and the electron temperature was reduced at the outer target. For locations $R_{2}$ and $R_{3}$, impurity B showed a more pronounced effect on the heat flux at the far-SOL of the outer target. Further analysis indicated that Ne atoms came mainly from the recycling sources, whereas B atoms came mainly from injection, and that their distinct atomic distributions resulted from the difference in the ionization threshold and ionization mean free path. In addition, the radiation proportion of B in the divertor region was larger than that of Ne when the total radiation power was similar, which suggests that B has less influence on the core region.

Reference (34)

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return